ASPICE مقابل ISO 26262 – ما الفرق؟
Iهل الامتثال لـ ASPICE ضرورة في صناعة السيارات؟ هل تتقاطع متطلبات ASPICE وISO 26262؟ وإلى أي مدى تختلف؟
These questions come up at many business meetings at companies developing automotive systems that already comply with ISO 26262. After all, introducing yet another standard is a time-consuming and costly undertaking.
That’s why we’ve prepared this ASPICE vs ISO 26262 comparison. It explains the differences and similarities between these two standards and provides answers as to whether ASPICE certification is worth the effort.
ISO 26262 مقابل ASPICE – الفروقات
الاختلافات الرئيسية بين ISO 26262 vs ASPICE تكمن في غرضها وتطبيقها ونطاقها وتركيزها:
الغرض
ISO 26262 هو المعيار الدولي للسلامة الوظيفية للأنظمة الكهربائية والإلكترونية في المركبات البرية. The goal of ISO 26262 is to cover all functional safety aspects of the development process. It provides the automotive safety lifecycle: from management, development and production to service. Safety is the main concern of the ISO 26262 standard.
في المقابل، يحدد ASPICE أفضل الممارسات والعمليات لتطوير برمجيات السيارات التي لا ترتبط بالضرورة بالسلامة. It’s used to evaluate whether the supplier meets a specific level of quality and certain safety and performance standards. Based on the audit conducted by external, independent ASPICE-certified assessors, a supplier obtains a capability level from 0 (Incomplete) to 5 (Innovating) for each process in the assessment scope. Levels 2 and 3 are usually perceived by clients as the universal standards for excellence, while levels 4 and 5 are rather treated as aspirations.
التطبيق
The ASPICE assessment concerns process implementation at the organisational, project or system level, while ISO 26262 applies only on a system level. The assessment is performed to ensure that all the functional safety objectives for the determined safety-critical level, are fulfilled correctly.
النطاق والتركيز
ISO 26262 is much more extensive than ASPICE in terms of volume. ISO 26262 contains sections beyond the scope of ASPICE, such as, for example, Item Definition, Risk Management based on ISO 31000, FMEA, FMEDA, FTA, HARA, HW and Production aspects.
The focus of ASPICE is the continuous improvement of the implemented processes to raise the supplier’s capability level. In ISO 26262, the focus is on filling all the gaps in compliance identified by the audit – process improvement is not required unless necessary to achieve compliance. Also, ASPICE takes into consideration the cost and schedule of the development schedule, while ISO 26262 primarily targets functional safety.
اكتشف المزيد عن ASPICE في دليلنا
احصل على الكتاب الإلكتروني
هل الامتثال لمعيار ASPICE إلزامي للموردين؟
It’s worth noting that compliance with both ISO 26262 and ASPICE isn’t mandatory by any international law, however, it gives a significant competitive advantage in the automotive industry. The leading OEMs, like BMW or Audi, choose their software or electronic suppliers based on their ASPICE assessment rating. كما يلتزم العديد من الموردين بمعيار ISO 26262 هذه الأيام لدرجة أنه يُنظر إليه كمعيار أساسي في صناعة السيارات، وتشترط جميع شركات تصنيع المعدات الأصلية الكبرى التزام مورديها به.
خلاصة القول
بالنسبة للأنظمة Automotive الحيوية، فإن أفضل وأكثر الأساليب الموصى بها هي الالتزام بمعايير ASPICE و ISO 26262 معًا. وبهذه الطريقة، يمكن الحفاظ على مخاطر الأعطال المحتملة عند الحد الأدنى.
Compliance with ASPICE and ISO 26262 is also a prerequisite for starting business cooperation with the majority of leading OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers who work with the OEMs. It’s a significant competitive advantage that plays a key role in contract negotiations.
If you decide to go through the ASPICE certification process, our experts can provide your team with ASPICE training for any role and at any level. We can also conduct an audit and gap analysis to help you identify areas for improvement and implement the necessary changes.
arrow_circle_rightاتصل بنا
